The other day I was in my local Wetherspoons having a spot of dinner, and trying not to look like a complete loner.
As is common place on a Friday night, the pub was packed, and I must have looked terribly selfish having that small, square table by the pillar all to myself. So as not to come across as having been stood up by anyone, I occupied myself by reading the in house magazine that 'Spoons bring out every couple of months or so. It is mostly a fairly dull affair, full of articles about which pubs in the chain have won awards for this, that and the other, but in this issue, two articles court my eye.
The first was the forward to the magazine, written each month by the Chairman, Tim Martin. He was complaining about the double standards of the Government in trying to tackle underage drinking and how actually all they were doing was driving the problem underground and away from the watchful eye of the local landlord. He then admitted that he himself had recently been refused entry to one of his own pubs because his 22 year old daughter, whom he was with, wasn't carrying any ID. She herself had worked in that very pub not 4 years previously, which made the whole scenario even more bizarre.
The second and far longer article was about a new 'Spoons pub
that has been built using the latest technology to make it environmentally friendly. The two page piece went into some detail about what bits of kit are being installed and how they will be used. They have put everything into this pub, from double the legally required amount of insulation to solar panels, wind turbines, sun pipes, ground source heat pumps and condensing boilers. I'm no expert on green technology, but I do know a bit, and they have really gone to town to make sure that this place uses as little conventional energy to power it as possible.
As I finished the article I began to think about how important it is to start using these new technologies as an interim measure in our little battle with the future of the planet and how bizarre it is that their take up has not been more wide spread.
The building I live in was completed in summer 2006 and opened shortly thereafter, so it's not exactly old. Certainly, the technology used to make the new Wetherspoons an environmentally friendly pub were well established by the time the plans for my home were drawn up, and yet as far as I know, not one of these great new innovations have been incorporated into this apartment block.
This saddens me, as it'd be nice to think that new builds at least could be making an effort, even if older housing stock is a little trickier to convert. Ok so the insulation here is pretty good. It's October and I'm sat here in a t-shirt with the heating off and my desk fan whirring away to stop me melting, but who knows how much power that is using?
The thing about global warming and climate change etc though is this: here am I, complaining about how many energy efficient light bulbs there are in the room and towing the Government's line on environmental issues, when I myself don't believe the argument.
No matter what politicians may try to tell you, the solution to global warming is not to turn off the kitchen light every time you leave the room. No, it isn't. Nope. No buts. It just isn't. You want reasons? Ok, here are two of them:
First off, you cannot change human behaviour to that extent that quickly. We are all used to living a comfortable and pleasant life where we have as much electricity as we want, whenever we want it. Right now I am sat here with 8 lamps on, my desk fan, my computer and my digital photo frame on top on the TV, and you know what? I have no intention of ever giving up my right to waste that electricity as I please. Why should I? It is mine. I pay for it though the nose so that I can do just this. And that will never change. I don't mind switching from regular bulbs to energy efficient ones, because as I see it, they are just as good. But there ain't no way I'm going to sit in the dark just to save the planet, and nor should you.
The second reason is that it just won't work. That's to say if everyone in the world did everything being suggested to minimise our carbon foot prints, we would still be pumping out too many green house gases to reverse climate change. It's a fact. This planet has over 6 billion human beings on it. 6 BILLION.
That is too many. We could switch the whole world over to low power light bulbs, give each of them an A rated fridge and make everybody walk to work and we'd still be up to our necks in unwanted carbon.
The Government pedal this as the solution because it is the cheapest option. They do it because the alternative is that they will have to pump billions of pounds of tax payers? money into researching real clean technologies, and if they did that, how would they ever be able to pay for all the new stationary, every time they decide to rename one of their failing departments?
You see, for all the campaigning by the Green nuts to get us to turn our TVs off at the wall, electricity is not actually a bad thing. In fact it is the single cleanest and most versatile energy form there is, and there is absolutely no environmental argument against using it as much as we can. There is a good economic one of course, namely utility companies love to fuck us in the arse and the wallet every time the quarterly bills come round, but that is another matter. There is nothing environmentally wrong with electricity.
What is wrong is the way we produce it. Burning fossil fuels to generate electricity is a very messy business, and thanks to the problem of radioactive waste, nuclear fission isn't looking any better. But why are we bothering with either of these two methods anyway? Follow an energy trail back through time and no matter what route you take, you will always end up with the same common source: the sun.
The sun is a true God send. Day after day it continues to pump out more energy than a trillion of us could ever use, even with all the lights on at the same time. It really is the best place from which to harness energy and convert it into electrical form, and yet at the moment we are being really shit about getting it directly.
Solar technology is a fantastic invention, but recently it has hit something of a road block in its development. As I'm sure you know, white light is made up of a spectrum of colours, each operating on a slightly different wavelength. What you may not know is that 90% of the energy in light is tied up in the red wavelength, and that current solar technology is completely unable to extract this energy.
The reason why solar technology has had such a poor reception, with people complaining about the panels not working on a cloudy day etc is because almost all the energy available in everyday light is being wasted. If we could find a way to harness that red light, our problems would be solved! There would be so much energy coming in from these solar panels that even on a gloomy day, enough electricity would be being generated from half a dozen panels on your roof to power half the street.
What's more, a recent technological breakthrough means that solar panels can now be printed onto surfaces as easily as ink is onto paper. This means that more or less any surface can become a solar panel, without the need of all that heavy and fragile glass. It also costs almost nothing to do.
Now, if I were in government and faced with the current crisis, I'm pretty sure where I'd be wanting to invest my money.
The other big issue with climate change is transport. Our cars will be the death of our planet we are told, and yet where is the alternative? Forgetting road congestion, which is a completely separate issue, we are faced with yet another technological dilemma. Petrol is bad for the environment, and yet we need it to get around. Or do we? The other week I saw an episode of Click
, the BBC's flagship technology short on BBC News 24. They did a feature from Silicon Valley that looked at the latest advances in electric cars, and boy have there been advances!
I don't know about you, but when I think of electric cars I'm reminded of the prototypes they built and tested about 20 years ago. They were oddly shaped, drove no faster than a milk float and ran out of power after about a mile. Not anymore. Thanks to some extraordinary advances in battery technology, fuelled in part by the boom in portable consumer electronics, it is now possible to draw very large amounts of power from very small cells.
In the example we were shown on Click
, an American firm have built a Roadster. It looks as good as any Ferrari and does 0-60 in 4 seconds flat, with a top speed of 130MPH. It can do 200 miles on a single charge cycle, which by the way is about what I get out of my Fiesta going back and forth to work each day. It runs silently and is powered by a battery pack no bigger than a conventional fuel tank, so you don't lose a lot of space. If this was freely available on the market today at a reasonable price, I honestly doubt anyone would ever buy petrol again.
In fact, combine this with the solar technology we were talking about earlier, and it would be possible to drive around without ever damaging the environment. There has, I admit been some concern about charging such cars if you live anywhere where running an extension lead to the car is not safe or practical, but here we look to the world of boats and caravans for a solution. In marinas and caravan parks alike, electricity is provided by a small pillar poking out of the ground next to each vehicle. This pillar contains mains power sockets covered by a water tight lockable flap, similar to the ones you get on outdoor sockets for homes.
These could quite easily be installed on streets outside homes with very little fuss. They'd be placed on the curb side next to where you park your car and would be connected to the mains supply for your house via cable buried under the pavement. The flap would be held down by a lock, to prevent anyone else from stealing your power, and all you would need to do would be to plug it into your car when you came home at night and unplug it in the morning. Simple.
Ok, looking back up the page I seem to have written rather a lot on this subject, but hopefully you've got my point. All the technology we need to reverse climate change is either freely available or just around the corner, and all that is lacking is the will power and a little investment by the Government to ensure that our children won't have to wear plugs in their bottoms to make sure that no one farts and upsets the delicate atmospheric balance that we are currently in the process of creating.